Abstract
ABSTRACT This article provides an analysis of Emer de Vattel’s theory of territorial sovereignty. It argues that Vattel’s theory cannot be reduced to the agriculturalist theory of property, with which he is often associated. Instead, he draws from Christian Wolff and Samuel von Pufendorf for a conception of the nation as a complete moral person. Through an examination of the exceptions Vattel carves out for nations, it becomes clear that his defense of territorial sovereignty depends more on the nation’s claim to natural liberty that a duty to cultivate, placing Vattel’s ideas within a tradition of critiquing empire. He presents a theory of the territorial nation-state situated in a ‘native country’ that holds both rights to sovereignty and ownership, which are naturally connected through the moral person of the nation. This suggests that the normative foundation of the territorial state depend on a theory of naturally free pre-political nations.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.