Abstract

Much discussion of dandyism in nineteenth-century France has focused on the relationship between this concept and an implicitly monolithic model of masculine identity initially associated with Beau Brummell. This article questions this tendency in two ways. First, it argues that male dandyism was more historically and linguistically context-dependent than has typically been acknowledged. The shifting semantics of dandyism become evident once canonical representations are reintegrated into the non-literary genres and discourses from which they emerged, including journalism, the Parisian literary physiology, and contemporaneous writing on temperament and psychology. The typologies, terms and concepts which circulated within these amorphous discourses frequently shaped contemporaneous readers' responses to literary texts. Second, the article seeks to outline a body of neglected discourse about female dandies and related types such as the lionne, focusing on texts by Barbey d'Aurevilly produced during the 1840s. These problematic figures, it proposes, illustrate the intense ambivalence generated by the concept of female exception in mid-nineteenth-century France, a cultural context in which female anomaly was viewed at once as a logical impossibility, a pathology, and an instance of moral monstrosity or sin.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.