Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between financial expenditure and carbon emission reduction using provincial-level dynamic panel data from 1996 to 2010. A positive correlation exists between the scale of financial expenditure and per capita carbon emissions, whereas a negative correlation exists between the composition of financial expenditure and per capita carbon emissions. The effects of subentry spending on the carbon emission reduction differ. An improvement in the relief structure of social security increases per capita carbon emissions, whereas an improvement in the composition of medical treatment and public health has no effect on per capita carbon emissions. Other forms of "pro-carbon emission reduction" spending lead to a reduction in per capita carbon emissions. An improvement in the composition of financial expenditure leads to a reduction in the carbon emissions of the second and third industries only. Meanwhile, the effect of the scale of financial expenditure is widespread across all industries.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
