Abstract
The objective of this research work is to examine the procedural institution of the Preventive Prison. For this purpose, it intends to specify if this measure is compatible with the paradigm change of our procedural system, and establish what is the reason for its existence. It also emphasizes the importance of language to build the meaning of legal institutions, thereby seeking to determine the legal nature of the Prison, deconstruct their material budgets, and question their current term. Finally, it concludes by providing recommendations to rationalize the use of the Preventive Prison, and noting that while currently seeking to propose criteria to harmonize with constitutional standards, it is impossible, because a Constitutional State can not admit that this institution inherited from the system Inquisitive remains in force, because it violates the state of innocence and the right not to be deprived of freedom without prior trial.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
