Abstract

The network of institutions that comprise the Olympic Movement include several whose authoritative scope now extends far beyond the mere staging of the Olympic and Paralympic Games to govern some important aspects of virtually all major regional and global competition and to foster the development of a comprehensive body of international sports law. The issues include nationality, which is the focus of this essay. More broadly, the proper resolution of nationality issues in the sports arena offers a limited model for reconciling tensions between national and international interests in the progressive development of international law.

Highlights

  • The network of institutions that comprise the Olympic Movement include several whose authoritative scope extends far beyond the mere staging of the Olympic and Paralympic Games to govern some important aspects of virtually all major regional and global competition and to foster the development of a comprehensive body of international sports law

  • The proper resolution of nationality issues in the sports arena offers a limited model for reconciling tensions between national and international interests in the progressive development of international law

  • Rule 6(1) of the Olympic Charter begins by providing that “[t]he Olympic Games are competitions between athletes in individual or team events and not between countries.”[1]. This is the basis for the abiding aspiration to maximize opportunities for athletes in their individual interests and as role models while minimizing geopolitical interference in the sports arena

Read more

Summary

SYMPOSIUM ON THE OLYMPICS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW

THE MUTUALITY OF NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL IDENTITIES IN INTERNATIONAL SPORTS LAW. The network of institutions that comprise the Olympic Movement include several whose authoritative scope extends far beyond the mere staging of the Olympic and Paralympic Games to govern some important aspects of virtually all major regional and global competition and to foster the development of a comprehensive body of international sports law. The issues include nationality, which is the focus of this essay. The proper resolution of nationality issues in the sports arena offers a limited model for reconciling tensions between national and international interests in the progressive development of international law

The Olympic Charter Framework
Accelerated Naturalization
AJIL UNBOUND
National and International Identities
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call