The mutagenic effects of diacridines and diquinolines in microbial systems

Abstract

Two series of difunctional DNA-intercalating agents (diacridines and diquinolines) were tested for mutagenic properties in Samonella typhimurium strain TA1537, and for ‘petite’ mutagenesis activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and also compared in terms of their structural, lipophilic and DNA-binding properties. Diacridines with only a short chain length were monointercalators, while those with an alkyl linker chain longer than C6 were bisintercalators. Although the bisintercalators especially bound very tightly to DNA, none of these compounds was as effective a frameshift mutagen in TA1537 as the parent chromophore 9-aminoacridine. However, the two (monointercalating) diacridines of shortest chain length were still able to cause frameshifts, and this ability returned (albeit weakly) in the bisintercalators of longest chain length. Although 9-aminoacridine showed no ability for ‘petite’ mutagenesis, the diacridines of longer chain length were very effective in causing this mitochondrial event. In the quinoline series, both the parent chromophore (4-aminoquinoline) and all the diquinolines were weak monointercalators. None of these compounds showed any ability for frameshift mutagenesis, although some were very weak mitochondrial mutagens. It is concluded that linking two acridines produces compounds whose mutagenic properties might have been predicted from our current knowledge of the patent molecules. However, despite a similar ability to intercalate DNA, the diquinolines show no resemblance to acridines in their mutagenic properties.