Abstract

The headscarf conceals hair and other external features of a head (such as the ears). It therefore may have implications for the way in which such faces are perceived. Images of faces with hair (H) or alternatively, covered by a headscarf (HS) were used in three experiments. In Experiment 1 participants saw both H and HS faces in a yes/no recognition task in which the external features either remained the same between learning and test (Same) or switched (Switch). Performance was similar for H and HS faces in both the Same and Switch condition, but in the Switch condition it dropped substantially compared to the Same condition. This implies that the mere presence of the headscarf does not reduce performance, rather, the change between the type of external feature (hair or headscarf) causes the drop in performance. In Experiment 2, which used eye-tracking methodology, it was found that almost all fixations were to internal regions, and that there was no difference in the proportion of fixations to external features between the Same and Switch conditions, implying that the headscarf influenced processing by virtue of extrafoveal viewing. In Experiment 3, similarity ratings of the internal features of pairs of HS faces were higher than pairs of H faces, confirming that the internal and external features of a face are perceived as a whole rather than as separate components.

Highlights

  • It is a clicheof racist discourse that members of some particular ethnic group ‘‘all look the same’’

  • A main effect of Condition was observed (F (1, 76) = 74.086, p,0.001). This showed that participants in the same between learning and test (Same) condition performed significantly better compared to those in the Switch condition

  • A main effect of Condition was observed, F (1, 39) = 34.74, p,0.001, partial g2 = 0.471. This showed that participants in the Same condition performed significantly better than the participants in the Switch condition, as in Experiment 1

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is a clicheof racist discourse that members of some particular ethnic group ‘‘all look the same’’. Been shown that persons of one group do tend to find it harder to perform face recognition tasks on stimuli composed of ethnic groups other than their own [1] This is generally known as the own race bias, and has been investigated in a very large number of studies over the past 45 years or so, employing a profusion of different methodologies including recognition performance and eye tracking (eg [2]).The general finding stands despite the fact that faces of most racial groups are of comparable heterogeneity, and this is an effect that seems to be largely independent of the prejudices of the viewer. This dissimilarity in appearance is illustrated dramatically in a piece of contemporary artwork [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call