Abstract

Nagorno-Karabakh is currently considered the most militarized area in the South Caucasus region. The key political decision-makers of Armenia come from Stepanakert. The issue of the future of this territory is an important element of any electoral campaign in Armenia. Any plans to make concessions to the Azerbaijani side are opposed by Armenian nationalist and veteran circles. The memory of the armed conflict with Azerbaijan remains vivid and is reflected in numerous commemorative initiatives in the NKR, as exemplified by the Memorial Museum of the Perished Soldiers and the Memorial Museum – The Union of Relatives of Missing Warriors of the NKR in Stepanakert. These institutions are a synthesis of museum and funeral practices. To quote Aleksander Wallis, replacing ‘monuments’ with ‘museums,’ it may be concluded that they “were created to historicize current events” which “evoke the greatest emotions, tensions and conflicts” and stem from “profound moral needs.” However, unlike monuments whose “artistic shape and symbolic meaning [...] permit different interpre- tations in formal and artistic categories as well as in the categories of meaning, ideology and politics” (Wallis, 1968), the two museums do not give such freedom. Besides commemoration, they also serve the purpose of constructing and consolidating hostility towards Azerbaijan – the raison d’être of the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. The conflict is the foundation of the idea of Artsakh and the main political implication of the spatial values represented by the MMPS and MMMW. The unique character of these museums, however, is not related to the politicization of re-membrance, which is a common feature of such establishments, but rather to the short temporal distance between the armed conflict and the emergence of the exhibitions. Consequently, the memory of the museums’ creators has not been ‘borrowed’ and the message of the museums reflects the current attitude to Azerbaijan.

Highlights

  • The two museums are weapons in their struggle to maintain the territorial status quo and obtain international recognition for their state, which justifies calling the two institutions ‘frontline museums.’. Their ‘frontline’ character can be interpreted in three ways: –– firstly, as the proof of remembrance of the Armenian victims of the armed conflict with Azerbaijan; –– secondly, as playing the main role in shaping Armenian national awareness; –– thirdly, metaphorically – as the borderline of the Armenian narrative about the right to Nagorno-Karabakh, beyond which the Azerbaijani alternative begins;2 this point of contact is like a meteorological ‘frontline,’ understood as the place where two advancing formations collide

  • To commemorate the Karabakh Armenians who died or went missing as a result of the armed conflict with Azerbaijan, two museums were created in Stepanakert: the Museum of the Perished Soldiers (MMPS) and the MMMW

  • The MMPS and MMMW constitute a part of the social space for Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh

Read more

Summary

INSPIRATIONS AND METHODOLOGY

Spaces created as a consequence of these processes constitute the representation of the values of a specific group They are treated as a non-economic ‘property’ used in order to perform specific collective and individual activities The two museums are weapons in their struggle to maintain the territorial status quo and obtain international recognition for their state, which justifies calling the two institutions ‘frontline museums.’ Their ‘frontline’ character can be interpreted in three ways: –– firstly, as the proof of remembrance of the Armenian victims of the armed conflict with Azerbaijan; –– secondly, as playing the main role in shaping Armenian national awareness; –– thirdly, metaphorically – as the borderline of the Armenian narrative about the right to Nagorno-Karabakh, beyond which the Azerbaijani alternative begins; this point of contact is like a meteorological ‘frontline,’ understood as the place where two advancing formations collide. Performative acts involved gestures performed during visits to both museums in order to trigger interaction on the one hand and to express one’s own views on the other

EXPLORING THE MUSEUM SPACE
ASSIGNING VALUE TO THE MUSEUM SPACE
FEATURES instrumental situational
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call