Abstract

Background: An individual with a high genetic load for psychiatric disorders is subject to a considerable risk factor for an affective illness. Family studies usually try to distinguish between bipolar and unipolar disorders since it was suggested that they might show different modes of inheritance. The aim of this study was to differentiate between healthy members of unipolar and bipolar families without a previous history of any psychiatric disorder according to the neurobiological and psychometric findings. Methods: We first analysed the results obtained from neurobiological and psychometric measurements taken from 75 healthy subjects who had at least two close relatives with a unipolar and a bipolar disorder. In a second step we examined the subjects with a parental affective disorder; finally, we compared the members of ‘pure’ unipolar, bipolar and of mixed families to each other. Results: The first-degree relatives of unipolar patients showed a significantly higher REM density and scored higher on scales of ‘neuroticism’ and ‘vegetative lability’ than the controls. No significant differences could be noticed between the relatives of unipolar and bipolar patients, either when considering the degree of relationship, or the parental type of affective disorder and the ‘purity’ of the respective families. Conclusions: We found some distinct neurobiological and psychometric differences between the relatives of unipolar patients and the control probands. No obvious differences, however, were ascertained between relatives of unipolar and bipolar patients. Therefore, we consider it to be possible that these findings represent potential vulnerability markers for affective disorders in general.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.