Abstract

The financial crisis and the ensuing budgetary cuts that have been imposed in many countries have sparked anti-austerity protests. One of the striking features of movements that self-identify as progressive is that they have directed the best part of their claims, efforts and discontent at state authorities. The reality of protest on the ground then seems to diverge from influential accounts of resistance such as Hardt and Negri’s, who point to its necessarily diffuse, transnational character. Although it suggests helpful ways to think about power, resistance and ethics on a transnational scale, Hardt and Negri's theoretical construction partly fails to capture the antagonisms and organizational forms that have emerged in the recent protest cycle. In order to remedy some of these weaknesses, the article borrows from social movement theory. It argues that the combination of Hardt and Negri's broader philosophical claims, themselves largely inspired by Italian autonomism, with a more sociological take on protest, can help us better identify the antagonisms and social forms pertaining to contemporary anti-austerity movements but also the organizational and strategic possibilities within local and national contexts. The results of this conversation are then applied to a specific struggle, the Quebec student strike.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call