Abstract
The question of culpability over decisions made by the multi-disciplinary team (MDT) is a contentious one. Currently, all members present remain responsible for the MDT's decision, but it is unclear whether the onus of decision making lies with the patient's “lead clinician”, and how straight to test pathways (bypassing a consultation with a specialist prior to MDT discussion) impact on this. Additionally, should a non-consensus recommendation be reached, it remains undetermined how dissenting members of the MDT would be viewed in a court of law. Given these uncertainties, there remains a substantial risk of legal action against the MDT as a group. Until case law materialises to provide clarification on these issues, clinicians should improve their awareness over their medico-legal responsibilities and proceed with caution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
