Abstract
Contemporary scholars critical of Pope Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara from his parents in Bologna, Italy, in 1858, appeal to Thomas Aquinas’s teaching against forced baptism of Jewish children in the Summa theologiae. However, these scholars have overlooked the fact that the question of Aquinas’s teaching against forced baptism was actually at the center of a rather extensive theological exchange between the Mortara family, and the Vatican’s papal counsel in 1858. This article demonstrates that without attention to the 1858 exchange, the contemporary debate lacks an understanding of the key theological questions, including the problem that Aquinas’s teaching was claimed by both sides. After an analysis of the appeals to Aquinas in the 1858 exchange, the article demonstrates why the contemporary discussion could benefit from a closer examination of Aquinas’s teaching against forced baptism of Jewish children in its historical context.
Highlights
In January 2018, controversy over the Mortara affair remerged in the United States with the publication of Dominican theologian Romanus Cessario’s essay defending Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara, from his home, in Bologna.[1]
Others criticized particular theological claims of Cessario’s essay, citing Aquinas’s teaching against forced baptism of Jewish children.[5]. Both Cessario and his critics appeal to Aquinas to argue for and against Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara
This contemporary debate has overlooked the fact that the question of Aquinas’s teaching on forced baptism was at the center of a rather extensive theological exchange between the Mortara family, and the Vatican’s papal counsel in 1858
Summary
In January 2018, controversy over the Mortara affair remerged in the United States with the publication of Dominican theologian Romanus Cessario’s essay defending Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara, from his home, in Bologna.[1]. Others criticized particular theological claims of Cessario’s essay, citing Aquinas’s teaching against forced baptism of Jewish children.[5] both Cessario and his critics appeal to Aquinas to argue for and against Pius IX’s decision to remove Edgardo Mortara. This contemporary debate has overlooked the fact that the question of Aquinas’s teaching on forced baptism was at the center of a rather extensive theological exchange between the Mortara family, and the Vatican’s papal counsel in 1858. I conclude with a brief summary of Aquinas’s argument against forced baptism of Jewish children
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
