Abstract
AbstractThree different polymer blends consisting of an isotropic matrix and a ther‐motropic liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) as the reinforcement were extruded. Polycarbonate (PC) and polyetherimide (PEI) were the two matrices, and the LCPs used were Vectraw A950 of Hoechst‐Celanese, a copolyester of hydroxybenzoic and 2,6 hydroxynaphthoic acids and an LCP of Granmont Inc., a condensation polymer of terephthalic acid, (l‐phenylethyl)hydroquinone, and phenylhydroqui‐none. These extrudates were characterized by a quantitative morphological technique to determine the percentage of LCP present as fibrils and the average domain diameter. These experimental observations were then coupled with the component Theological behavior and a simple heat transfer analysis to explain the morphology and property differences between the blends. Blends with the Granmont LCP showed no appreciable increase In the quantity of fibrils with draw ratio, for example, whereas the amount of fibrils in Vectra® blends tended to increase to a plateau with draw. The tensile modulus of the blends agreed well with composite theory, with average fibril moduli of 24.6 GPa and 23,3 GPa for Vectra® and the Granmont LCP, respectively. These differences can be explained in terms of the cooling behavior of the LCPs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
