Abstract
The clearcutting controversy that erupted on the Monongahela National Forest (MNF) in West Virginia in the mid-1970s is best known for its public outcry and resulting litigation. However, there is more to this story than vocal opponents and lawsuits. This chapter reveals firsthand accounts of the partnerships between land managers on the MNF and USDA Forest Service scientists working on the Fernow Experimental Forest. It was this cooperation, formed over decades, which provided a scientific basis for responding to the controversy and led to a viable alternative to clearcutting. This chapter briefly details the history of the MNF and describes the reasoning behind using even-aged forest management in the 1960s. A review of the controversy illustrates how the concerns of vocal opponents and the ensuing lawsuits led to a more integrated approach to land management on the MNF as well as all national forests in the 1970s. Cooperative research between MNF land managers and Fernow scientists resulted in the expanded use of two-aged forest management in the 1990s. Finally, this chapter includes recommendations for building and maintaining similar partnerships.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.