Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this work was to investigate the in‐vivo mode of action of glufosinate in comparison with that of the known glutamine synthetase inhibitor, methionine sulfoxmine, in photoautotrophic microorganisms. Using the eukaryotic green alga Chlorella fusca (Shih. & Krauss) and the cyanobacterium Anacystis nidulans (Kratz & Myers), currently developed [15N]NMR pulselabelling techniques have been employed to study the inhibition of ammonia assimilation. The results show that, while methionine sulfoximine immediately blocks glutamine synthesis, glufosinate action requires an induction process in both organisms investigated, possibly indicating the de‐novo synthesis of an amino acid membrane carrier. In addition, the observed ability of C. fusca to incorporate nitrogen into glutamate under glutamine synthetase‐inhibiting conditions is explicable by an anabolic function of a glutamate dehydrogenase in this organism. This might explain the large differences in observed species sensitivity to glufosinate exposure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
