Abstract

Medicago sativa L. (alfalfa) root hairs respond to Nod factors [NodRm-IV(C16:2,S)] in a host-specific manner with depolarization and rapid ion fluxes. Protoplasts prepared from these cells using the cell wall-digesting enzymes pectolyase and cellulase do not, or to a rather small extent, respond to Nod factors. In an effort to understand this activity loss we analyzed the mode of action of both enzymes with respect to their effects on the root hairs as well as their interference with the Nod factor response. (i) In the presence of the enzymes, Nod factor at saturating concentrations neither depolarized the plasma membrane of root hairs nor caused ion fluxes. Even after removal of the enzymes, Nod factor responses were strongly refractory. (ii) After a lag-phase of 12-18 s, pectolyase depolarized the plasma membrane, alkalized the external space, acidified the cytosol and increased the cytosolic Ca(2+) activity. (iii) Cellulase, without a lag-phase, depolarized the plasma membrane, acidified the cytosol, but only marginally increased the cytosolic Ca(2+) activity. Unlike pectolyase, the cellulase response was only weakly refractory to a second addition. (iv) Neither enzyme increased the membrane conductance, but pectolyase inhibited the H(+)-pump. (v) Pectolyase shows all the signs of an elicitor, while cellulase yields a mixed response. (vi) Denatured enzymes yielded strong effects similar to those of untreated enzymes. We conclude that the effects shown do not originate from enzymatic activity, but from interactions of the proteins with cell wall or plasma membrane constituents. It is further concluded that these enzymes (pectolyase more so than cellulase) trigger defense-related signal pathways, which makes protoplasts prepared with such enzymes unsuitable for studies of symbiotic or defense-related signalling.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call