The misleading choice for safer births in Brazilian’s most developed region: a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the Cesarean Section (CS) rate in Brazilian women according to category of health insurance and individual characteristics associated with the mode of delivery.Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was performed in three maternity services (one public tertiary referral center, one maternity service for both public and private care, and one private maternity service) in Campinas city, Brazil. Eligibility criteria were: inpatient during the immediate postpartum period, hospital birth, single pregnancy, and live newborn. Sociodemographic and anthropometric data, reproductive history, pregnancy planning, and prenatal care information was obtained from participants. Comorbidities, type of birth, and newborn data were collected from medical records. The mode of delivery was categorized as either CS or vaginal delivery.Results: A total of 1276 women were included in this study. The overall CS rate was 57.5%. CS rates were 41.6, 54.8, and 90.1% for public, mixed (public and private), and private maternity services, respectively. Mean age was higher in women who had a CS (28.0 ± 6.0 years versus 25.9 ± 6.5 years, p < .0001) as was the mean Body Mass Index (25.2 ± 5.3 kg/m2 versus 23.8 ± 4.5 kg/m2, p < .0001). CS was related to higher education, employment, white skin color, planned pregnancy, antenatal care in a private service, and primiparity.Conclusions: The overall CS rate was high (greater than 50%); in the private service, almost all participants had a CS delivery (90.1%). Better socioeconomic conditions and primiparity were associated with higher CS rates in Brazil. Political pressure for the management of unnecessary CSs is vital in Brazil. Together with the provision of real incentives for normal deliveries in public and, most importantly, private services.