Abstract
Metallicities of the Milky Way globular cluster (GC) system are interpreted within the framework of a closed box model of chemical evolution. Model age-metallicity relations normalised to the Sun are compared with an observed age-metallicity relation constructed from literature data for the Galactic globular clusters and solar neighbourhood dwarf stars. One branch of the GC age-metallicity relation is seen to form a natural extension of the solar neighbourhood relation to low metallicities. Such clusters may fit in situ into the same Galactic closed-box model as many disk stars. Timescales for halo and disk GC formation are computed based on this assumption. However, a single closed box cannot account for a second branch in the GC age-metallicity data. This problem is addressed by assuming that some GCs did not form in situ within the closed box of the Galaxy, but rather were formed within separate parent objects whose chemical evolution was characterised by longer star formation timescales than the Milky Way box. These parent objects were eventually acquired by the Milky Way. Estimates are made of the initial mass and star formation timescale of those objects that contributed GCs to the accreted component of the Milky Way.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.