Abstract
With hindsight, the Empire appears a dominant characteristic of the Victorian age, which, we might think would have dominated military thinking. But in a study of the annals of the Journal of the then Royal United Services Institution, Paul Adams finds that there was in fact little specific discussion of empire and its military challenges. In the first of two articles, analysing the width and depth of subjects covered in the Journal from 1870 to 1899, Mr Adams shows that among the intelligent and experienced Army officers who spoke, wrote and took part in debates at the Institution, views of Empire, imperial defence and their importance took second place to ideas on European norms and tactics, the most thoughtful exception being Callwell's essay in the Journal which became his famous Small Wars. When discussion was centred on imperial topics, emphasis was placed on support services and logistics, and the martial characteristics of different races. In Part 2, Mr Adams concludes that despite the readers and contributors of the Journal being those most closely engaged with the expansion and defence of Empire, their concerns remained stubbornly Eurocentric, with the Empire generally regarded as a fringe interest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.