Abstract
This article examines the ways in which principal perpetrators of sexual violence crimes are situated in an international criminal court. It is based on a narrative psychological analysis of the sentencing judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). Specifically, the article argues that at least three narratives can be distinguished within the relevant legal texts: those of the chivalrous, the opportunistic and the remorseful perpetrator, each with a distinct plot structure: that of being a normal person responding adequately to a situation that is seen as normal; an abnormal person responding to what is seen as an abnormal (or extreme) situation; and a normal person responding inadequately to what is seen as an abnormal (or extreme) situation. The ways in which these plots come out depend on how the various voices in the courtroom position the perpetrator within the stories. Ultimately, these narratives represent different stories of how militarism and masculinity intersect to create different understandings of the soldier and military behavior. The mere analysis of this material, i.e. how sexual violence crimes are discussed in theatre in an international criminal court, is a scholarly contribution to the understanding of how sexual violence perpetrators can be situated in a war setting, and after. The findings suggest new perspectives on military perpetrators and changes in what is considered normal and abnormal behavior in military settings.
Highlights
This article examines the ways in which principal perpetrators of sexual violence crimes are situated in an international criminal court
This article presents a narrative analysis of the sentencing judgments against nine individuals in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) against principal sexual violence perpetrators and asks what the cases against them tell us about military perpetrators of sexual violence crimes
The focus of this article is the presentation and analysis of how sexual violence crimes are discussed in theatre in an international criminal court
Summary
This article examines the ways in which principal perpetrators of sexual violence crimes are situated in an international criminal court. The findings suggest new perspectives on military perpetrators and changes in what is considered normal and abnormal behavior in military settings My aim is to better understand how narratives of the perpetration of sexual violence crimes situate the notion of normal and abnormal behavior and to discuss what this might entail for our understanding of the sexual violence military perpetrator The basis for this analysis is sexual violence perpetrators brought to justice in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY). The article explores the extent to which sexual violence in war is seen as normal military behavior or not, in the eyes of the court
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
