Abstract

Simple SummaryManufacturing artificial living cells would open endless research possibilities in basic and applied sciences. With this motivation, many research groups are developing methodologies to construct a stable minimal cell that is capable of achieving metabolic homeostasis, reproducing, and evolving in a controlled environment. Using as a template the gene set for a minimal cell proposed previously by Gil and coworkers, we have put together a network depicting its inferred minimal metabolism needed for life. This network has been further compressed as a metabolic Directed Acyclic Graph (m-DAG) in order to better visualize its topology and to find its essential reactions (i.e., critical reactions to maintain the network’s connectivity). We have also compared this minimal m-DAG to those of the smallest natural genome known until now and a synthetic minimal cell created in the laboratory. The modeling of m-DAGs based on minimal metabolisms can be a first approach for the synthesis and manipulation of minimal cells.Defining the essential gene components for a system to be considered alive is a crucial step toward the synthesis of artificial life. Fifteen years ago, Gil and coworkers proposed the core of a putative minimal bacterial genome, which would provide the capability to achieve metabolic homeostasis, reproduce, and evolve to a bacterium in an ideally controlled environment. They also proposed a simplified metabolic chart capable of providing energy and basic components for a minimal living cell. For this work, we have identified the components of the minimal metabolic network based on the aforementioned studies, associated them to the KEGG database and, by applying the MetaDAG methodology, determined its Metabolic Building Blocks (MBB) and reconstructed its metabolic Directed Acyclic Graph (m-DAG). The reaction graph of this metabolic network consists of 80 compounds and 98 reactions, while its m-DAG has 36 MBBs. Additionally, we identified 12 essential reactions in the m-DAG that are critical for maintaining the connectivity of this network. In a similar manner, we reconstructed the m-DAG of JCVI-syn3.0, which is an artificially designed and manufactured viable cell whose genome arose by minimizing the one from Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0, and of “Candidatus Nasuia deltocephalinicola”, the bacteria with the smallest natural genome known to date. The comparison of the m-DAGs derived from a theoretical, an artificial, and a natural genome denote slightly different lifestyles, with a consistent core metabolism. The MetaDAG methodology we employ uses homogeneous descriptors and identifiers from the KEGG database, so that comparisons between bacterial strains are not only easy but also suitable for many research fields. The modeling of m-DAGs based on minimal metabolisms can be the first step for the synthesis and manipulation of minimal cells.

Highlights

  • One of the most ambitious aspirations of modern biology is to synthesize artificial living cells

  • To avoid any remaining biases toward any group of organisms and any need for synonym lists, we propose a minimal metabolic network defined by reactions and compounds instead of genes

  • Using the above obtained information, which is a set of reactions for each metabolic network, we generated the corresponding reaction graph that models the relationship between reactions in terms of shared metabolites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the most ambitious aspirations of modern biology is to synthesize artificial living cells. Manufacturing a cell opens endless research possibilities, both in basic and advanced sciences, and it would be critical and a turning point in fields from medicine to evolutionary biology. To reduce the levels of difficulty on this task, most efforts are focused on the synthesis of minimal cells. They will help by increasing our understanding of living systems; on the other hand, they can be used as capsules for the introduction of genetic material to customize cells for applied purposes [1]. Several complementary paths have been followed in search of the proper technology and methods to design this fabricated cell. The most commonly used are the bottom–up and top–down approaches [2,3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call