THE MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONAL AS ARBITRATOR IN POST‐DIVORCE CHILD‐ORIENTED CONFLICT

Abstract

This article explores arbitration as a viable method of dispute resolution that is infrequently used in divorce‐related conflicts. The focus is on the use of mental health professionals, who have specific training and experience, to assess issues and make binding decisions in disputes that involve children. A case example highlights some of the issues in this form of arbitration. A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration compared to adjudication follows. The use of arbitration would seem particularly helpful in instances of chronic post‐divorce child‐related conflicts.