Abstract

The MEG (Mu to Electron Gamma) experiment has been running at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Switzerland since 2008 to search for the decay \meg\ by using one of the most intense continuous $\mu^+$ beams in the world. This paper presents the MEG components: the positron spectrometer, including a thin target, a superconducting magnet, a set of drift chambers for measuring the muon decay vertex and the positron momentum, a timing counter for measuring the positron time, and a liquid xenon detector for measuring the photon energy, position and time. The trigger system, the read-out electronics and the data acquisition system are also presented in detail. The paper is completed with a description of the equipment and techniques developed for the calibration in time and energy and the simulation of the whole apparatus.

Highlights

  • A search for the Charged Lepton Flavour Violating (CLFV) decay μ+ → e+γ, the MEG experiment is in progress at the Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI) in Switzerland

  • As with all phase-space measurements performed at high rate, a scanning technique was used: either one using a small cylindrical “pill” scintillator of 2 mm diameter and 2 mm thickness coupled to a miniature PMT [8], or one using a thick depletion layer Avalanche PhotoDiode (APD), without a scintillator, in the case of measurements in a magnetic field

  • After the subtraction of these effects, the γ -ray conversion time is obtained by combining the timings of those PMTs which contain more than 50 photoelectrons and calculating the minimum value of χ2 defined as a sum of the squared difference between each calculated and reconstructed time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Drift CHamber (DCH) system of the MEG experiment [15] is designed to ensure precision measurement of positrons from μ+ → e+γ decays. It must fulfil several stringent requirements: cope with a huge number of Michel positrons due to a very high muon stopping rate up to 3 × 107 μ+/s, be a low-mass tracker as the momentum resolution is limited by multiple Coulomb scattering and in order to minimise the accidental γ -ray background by positron annihilation-in-flight, and provide excellent resolution in the measurement of the radial coordinate as well as in the z coordinate. The two detector planes are enclosed by the so-called hood cathode. The middle as well as the hood cathodes are made of a 12.5 μm-thick polyamide foil with an aluminium deposition of 2500 Å

Experimental requirements
Spectrometer coupling system
Commissioning
Beam line performance
Requirements
Realisation
Automated insertion
Optical alignment
Software alignment
Multiple scattering contribution from the target
Concept
Superconducting magnet
Compensation coils
Excitation tests
Mapping of magnetic field
Design of DCH module
Charge division and vernier pads
Counting gas
Pressure regulation system
HV system
Readout electronics
Alignment tools and optical survey
Track-based alignment: the Millipede
Michel alignment
Alignment with the LXe detector
Time calibration
Tracking
4.10.1 Single hit resolution
4.10.2 Angular resolution
4.10.4 Energy resolution
4.10.3 Vertex resolution
4.10.6 DCH efficiency
4.10.5 Chamber detection efficiency
Timing Counter
Concept and design of the Timing Counter
The longitudinal detector
Commissioning and in-situ performance
Gain equalisation
Time Walk effect
Time offsets
Timing resolution of TC
Positron timing resolution
Position resolution
Efficiency
Liquid Xenon detector
Detector design
Cryostat
Purification system
Storage system
Detector operation
Reconstruction methods
Waveform analysis
Position
Energy
Timing
Energy resolution
Timing resolution
Detector uniformity and energy scale
Rejection of pile-up events
Rejection of cosmic ray events
Detection efficiency
Calibrations
LXe detector calibration
LEDs and gain evaluation
Point-like α-sources
Quantum efficiency evaluation
Monochromatic positron beam
The Cockcroft–Walton accelerator
The trigger scheme
Online algorithms
Hardware implementation
Operation and performance
Front-end electronics
Splitters
Trigger bus
DAQ synchronisation
DAQ system
Online cluster
MIDAS software
Performance
Dead time during event read-out
Other sources of dead time
10 Slow Control
10.1 MSCB system
10.1.1 Communication
10.1.2 Communication protocol
10.1.3 Local intelligence
10.1.4 High-voltage system
10.1.5 RS-232 and GPIB interface nodes
10.1.6 SCS-2000 control box
10.2 DAQ integration
10.2.1 MIDAS slow control front-end
10.2.2 MIDAS custom pages
11 Simulation
11.1 The simulation architecture
11.2 Physics event simulation
11.3 Detector simulation
11.4 Bartender
11.4.1 Format conversion
11.6 Comparison with data
11.4.2 Readout simulation
11.4.3 Event mixing
Findings
11.5 Database
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call