Abstract

Physicians who care for children with life-threatening conditions are uniquely positioned to support families through the dying phase when treatment efforts have failed. Taking on this role for families requires a great deal of time and strategic emotional labor. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 12 physicians across two different children's hospitals on the east coast, I find that these physicians conceptualize this work as a fundamental responsibility to the children and families in their care despite believing that their formal medical training fails to prepare them for this component of their jobs. These physicians deliberately laid groundwork for the potential that children may die from their earliest interactions with patients and worked to shift families away from continued medical intervention when they believed such efforts to be futile. They described this work as deeply meaningful and rewarding, but potentially emotionally overwhelming. These physicians felt duty-bound to address what they perceived as a deficit in medical training by intentionally modeling emotionally intense exchanges with families for the next generation of practitioners. Though these dual commitments demanded extensive and potentially exhausting emotional labor, this particular group of physicians was able to use the structural features of their faculty positions in academic medical centers to buffer against potential burnout, maintain their emotional capacity at work and home, and protect their own well-being. My analysis shows that when physicians inhabit structurally favorable working conditions and conceptualize their jobs in ways that center emotional support for patients they may use these resources to work to mitigate disparities in care and take pride in their ability to provide sustained and substantive emotional support at the end of life.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call