Abstract

BackgroundSocioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of population health. Explanatory approaches on how SES determines health have so far included numerous factors, amongst them psychosocial factors such as social relationships. However, it is unclear whether social relationships can help explain socioeconomic differences in general subjective health. Do different aspects of social relationships contribute differently to the explanation? Based on a cohort study of middle and older aged residents (45 to 75 years) from the Ruhr Area in Germany our study tries to clarify the matter.MethodsFor the analyses data from the population-based prospective Heinz Nixdorf Recall (HNR) Study is used. As indicators of SES education, equivalent household income and occupational status were employed. Social relations were assessed by including structural as well as functional aspects. Structural aspects were estimated by the Social Integration Index (SII) and functional aspects were measured by availability of emotional and instrumental support. Data on general subjective health status was available for both baseline examination (2000–2003) and a 5-year follow-up (2006–2008). The sample consists of 4,146 men and women. Four logistic regression models were calculated: in the first model we controlled for age and subjective health at baseline, while in models 2 and 3, either functional or structural aspects of social relationships were introduced separately. Model 4 then included all variables. As former studies indicated different health effects of SES and social relations in men and women, analyses were conducted with the overall sample as well as for each gender alone.ResultsProspective associations of SES and subjective health were reduced after introducing social relationships into the regression models. Percentage reductions between 2% and 30% were observed in the overall sample when all aspects of social relations were included. The percentage reductions were strongest in the lowest SES group. Gender specific analyses revealed mediating effects of social relationships in women and men. The magnitude of mediating effects varied depending on the indicators of SES and social relations.ConclusionsSocial relationships substantially contribute to the explanation of SES differences in subjective health. Interventions for improving social relations which especially focus on socially deprived groups are likely to help reducing socioeconomic disparities in health.

Highlights

  • Socioeconomic status (SES) is an important determinant of population health

  • Different SES indicators have been associated with social relationships in previous studies: poor social relations are more likely to occur in low SES groups [4,5]

  • When measures of social relations were introduced as mediators into the regression models, percentage reductions of the odds ratios between 2% and 30% were observed in the overall sample

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Explanatory approaches on how SES determines health have so far included numerous factors, amongst them psychosocial factors such as social relationships. It is unclear whether social relationships can help explain socioeconomic differences in general subjective health. Numerous studies show that socioeconomic status (SES) affects people’s health status. Different SES indicators have been associated with social relationships in previous studies: poor social relations are more likely to occur in low SES groups [4,5]. For example this study revealed that persons with low education had an odds ratio (OR) of 2.1 to report social isolation compared to the group with highest education. When SES was measured by income, low income groups had an OR of 2.4 to report social isolation

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call