Abstract

To understand the ways in which past stone knappers controlled the morphology of the flakes they produced, archaeologists have focused on examining the effects of striking platform attributes on flake size and shape. Among the variables commonly considered, platform width has routinely been noted to correlate with flake size and hence used to explain past knapping behaviors. Yet, the influence of platform width on flake variation remains equivocal due to the fact that the attribute is not under the direct control of the knapper. Instead, platform width tends to be treated as a by-product of other independent knapping parameters, such as platform depth. In this study, we hypothesize that platform width acts as an intermediary that intervenes the effect of other independent variables on flake attributes. By analyzing experimental flakes produced under both controlled and replicative settings, the results support the hypothesis that platform width mediates the effect of platform depth on flake width, such that flakes with relatively larger platform widths are generally wider but no longer. This finding provides a way to incorporate platform width into discussions of the interrelationships among knapping variables, and highlights the importance of platform width for investigating how past knappers controlled flake production through platform manipulation.

Highlights

  • Understanding lithic reduction and its influence on archaeological stone artefact variability is a central imperative of lithic research

  • With the same experimental dataset, we evaluate the second prediction about the mediating role of platform width (PW) by using a mediation analysis to assess whether PW exerts an intermediary effect on the relationship between independent variables, such as platform depth (PD) and exterior platform angle (EPA), and flake attributes

  • The curved platforms and the multi-ridged platforms produced similar PW-PD ratios, while the center-ridged cores produced notably narrower platforms relative to PD. This observation is supported by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) that shows notable differences in the PW-PD ratios among the three platform types (F(2:147) = 99.41, p

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding lithic reduction and its influence on archaeological stone artefact variability is a central imperative of lithic research. To this end, researchers routinely employ replicative flintknapping to reconstruct past reduction procedures and sequences. Researchers routinely employ replicative flintknapping to reconstruct past reduction procedures and sequences Today, this approach dominates stone artefact studies. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call