Abstract

An epoxy resin, cured using an anhydride hardener, has been modified by the addition of pre-formed polysiloxane core-shell rubber (S-CSR) particles with a mean diameter of 0.18 μm. The glass transition temperature, Tg, of the cured unmodified epoxy polymer was 148 °C, and this was unchanged after the addition of the S-CSR particles. The polysiloxane rubber particles had a Tg of about −100 °C. Atomic force microscopy showed that the S-CSR particles were well-dispersed in the epoxy polymer. The addition of the S-CSR particles reduced the Young's modulus and tensile strength of the epoxy polymer, but at 20 °C the fracture energy, GIc, increased from 117 J/m2 for the unmodified epoxy to 947 J/m2 when 20 wt% of the S-CSR particles were incorporated. Fracture tests were also performed at −55 °C, −80 °C, and −109 °C. The results showed that the measured fracture energy of the S-CSR-modified epoxy polymers decreased significantly below room temperature. For example, at −109 °C, a fracture energy of 481 J/m2 was measured using 20 wt% of S-CSR particles. Nevertheless, this value of toughness still represented a major increase compared with the unmodified epoxy polymer, which possessed a value of GIc of 174 J/m2 at this very low test temperature. Thus, a clear fact that emerged was that the addition to the epoxy polymer of the S-CSR particles may indeed lead to significant toughening of the epoxy, even at temperatures as low as about −100 °C. The toughening mechanisms induced by the S-CSR particles were identified as (a) localised plastic shear-band yielding around the particles and (b) cavitation of the particles followed by plastic void growth of the epoxy polymer. These mechanisms were modelled using the Hsieh et al. approach [33,49] and the values of GIc of the S-CSR-modified epoxy polymers at the different test temperatures were calculated. Excellent agreement was found between the predictions and the experimentally measured fracture energies. Further, the experimental and modelling results of the present study indicated that the extent of plastic void growth was suppressed at low temperatures for the S-CSR-modified epoxy polymers, but that the localised shear-band yielding mechanism was relatively insensitive to the test temperature.

Highlights

  • Epoxy polymers are a class of high-performance thermosetting polymers which are widely used for the matrices of fibre-reinforced composite materials and as adhesives

  • It is generally accepted that the major toughening mechanism of rubber-toughened epoxies is based on a series of deformation processes, namely (a) localised plastic shear-band yielding around the rubber particles and (b) cavitation of the S-core-shell rubber (CSR) particles followed by plastic void growth of the epoxy polymer

  • Atomic force microscopy of the unmodified epoxy polymer showed that a homogeneous thermoset was formed, see Fig. 1(a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Epoxy polymers are a class of high-performance thermosetting polymers which are widely used for the matrices of fibre-reinforced composite materials and as adhesives. An alternative route to increase the toughness of epoxy polymers is to use core-shell rubber (CSR) particles. Typical core materials include polybutadiene [10] and acrylate-polyurethane rubbers [11] They have been shown to increase the toughness of both bulk polymers and fibre composites, e.g. Refs. It is generally accepted that the major toughening mechanism of rubber-toughened epoxies is based on a series of deformation processes, namely (a) localised plastic shear-band yielding around the rubber particles and (b) cavitation of the S-CSR particles followed by plastic void growth of the epoxy polymer It has been noted [1,3,5] that this second mechanism needs to be operative in order to typically achieve major increases in the toughness of the rubber-particle-modified epoxy polymer. The toughening mechanisms involved were identified, and analytical models were used to predict the modulus, yield stress and fracture energy

Materials
Dynamic-mechanical thermal analysis
Mechanical properties
Fracture tests
Microscopy studies
Microstructure studies
Glass transition temperature and viscoelastic properties
Tensile properties
20 C À55 C À80 C À109 C
Compressive properties
Toughening micromechanisms
Modelling of the DGs contribution
Modelling the DGv contribution
Conclusions
Application of the model

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.