The measurement of maximum water content (MWC) on waterlogged archaeological wood: A comparison between three different methodologies

Abstract

Abstract The analyses to determine the state of preservation of waterlogged archaeological wood follow three different directions: anatomical analyses, physical evaluation and chemical characterisation. Physical parameters (densities and moisture content) are the ones most frequently found in the specialised literature. The measurement of moisture content is normally referred as maximum water content (MWC) in the case of archaeological wood in waterlogged conditions, because wood has been long-time preserved by the lack of oxygen in waterlogged conditions. Aim of the paper is the comparison of three pre-measurement treatments in the calculations of MWC: without any vacuum-pressure treatment, after 300 mbar vacuum pressure and after 50 mbar impregnation in water. The evaluations were performed on 240 samples of waterlogged archaeological wood coming from different excavation sites and including different wood species (both hardwoods and softwoods) in different state of preservation, from low to very high decay. The three tested methodologies to measure the maximum water content on waterlogged archaeological wood provided substantially equivalent results. Nevertheless, a deeper analysis of the results showed that the MWC values of 300 mbar impregnations were rather low compared to MWC standard measurements. Thus, this impregnation was a little bit harsher, causing most probably an anatomical damage on a portion of most degraded samples. The opposite result was obtained after the 50 mbar impregnation procedure. In this case, the MWC values were slightly higher. This means that this treatment seemed to be more effective in subtracting even the smallest air bubbles trapped inside waterlogged archaeological wood samples. Some suggestions on how to measure MWC on waterlogged archaeological wood are detailed at the end of conclusions.