Abstract

Student effort on large-scale assessments has important implications on the interpretation and use of scores to guide decisions. Within the United States, English Language Learners (ELLs) generally are outperformed on large-scale assessments by non-ELLs, prompting research to examine factors associated with test performance. There is a gap in the literature regarding the test-taking motivation of ELLs compared to non-ELLs and whether existing measures have similar psychometric properties across groups. The Student Opinion Scale (SOS; Sundre, 2007) was designed to be administered after completion of a large-scale assessment to operationalize students’ test-taking motivation. Based on data obtained on 5,257 (41.8% ELL) 10th grade students, study purpose was to test the measurement invariance of the SOS across ELLs and non-ELLs based on completion of low- and high-stakes assessments. Preliminary item analyses supported the removal of two SOS items (Items 3 and 7) that resulted in improved internal consistency for each of the two SOS subscales: Importance, Effort. A subsequent multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) supported the measurement invariance of the scale’s two-factor model across language groups, indicating it met strict factorial invariance (Meredith, 1993). A follow-up latent means analysis found that ELLs had higher effort on both the low- and high-stakes assessment with a small effect size. Effect size estimates indicated negligible differences on the importance factor. Although the instrument can be expected to function similarly across diverse language groups, which may have direct utility of test users and research into factors associated with large-scale test performance, continued research is recommended. Implications for SOS use in applied and research settings are discussed.

Highlights

  • Large-scale assessments are an important accountability tool for student learning that affects K-12 educational practices in the United States (U.S.; Hamilton, 2003)

  • Item 1 received the highest rating across groups (“Doing well on this test was important to me”)

  • Large-scale assessments play a prominent role in a range of decisions related to the evaluation of student and school outcomes (Davies, 2008)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large-scale assessments are an important accountability tool for student learning that affects K-12 educational practices in the United States (U.S.; Hamilton, 2003). The impact of student effort on test performance indicates that it may be a source of construct irrelevant variance that can affect the reliability and validity of high-stakes assessment scores (Wolf and Smith, 1995; Haladyna and Downing, 2004). This may be reflected in students exerting low effort that results in poor test performance (Haladyna and Downing, 2004; Wise, 2009; Abdelfattah, 2010). For educators and school district administrators seeking to meet the learning needs of a diverse student population, assessing students’ test-taking effort can provide a basis for the extent to which scores can be used for programmatic, evaluative, and accountability purposes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call