Abstract

Problem statement: Persian carpets have long been a major commodity in the world market, controlled by the Tehran Carpet Bazaar and the Hamburg Free Harbor. Today about 200 private traders in the Hamburg Free Harbor area export their carpets to about 10,000 private carpet traders throughout the world, these being mainly of Iranian origin. The case of Persian Carpet represents one of the most magnificent and powerful examples of ethnic enclave economy in contemporary world. Approach: This study brought about some in depth knowledge, qualitative as well as quantitative, of how such an ethnic enclave economy of scale operates, how it reproduced itself and how it met the challenges, be it political, demographical or others. Results: The study showed, that in spite of major political turbulence in Iran since 1979, the spreading of state controlled trading companies inside and outside of Iran and increasing international market pressure due to the growth of copying production of Persian carpets in other countries, the Tehran-Hamburg axis remains the core of this trade-with private Iranian traders occupying the dominant position on both sides of the transaction line. Taking a closer look it became obvious that in particular, it is Iranian traders of Azarbaidjan descent who speak Azari, a language similar to Turkish, who control the trade in both cities. Understanding the character and strategies of ethnic economy and ethnic enclave economy this study concludes, that it was necessary to look beyond and within the demarcation of national background and even ethnic boundaries in a broader sense according to which these phenomena mistakenly had been attempted to be explained. Conclusion: The engine of ethnic enclave economy cannot be upheld without a core, entrance into mainstream economy which required both more than common national and ethnic background. The challenge for this economy is how to dissolve from strong ties to more loose organization based on rationally structured mode of organization. So far, however, the limited group of traders stick together in order to remain in control of this world-wide billion dollars trade.

Highlights

  • The persistence of the Tehran-Hamburg axis, in spite of political and market turbulence, as well as ethnic segregation as the dominant organization characteristic of the Hamburg Free Harbor, stand out as milestones in the presented case

  • The qualitative part of the case has, been supported by three additional face-to-face interviews conducted in the Netherlands, with one interviewee wishing to remain anonymous and three telephone interviews with former “Persian Carpet” traders in the Hamburg Free Harbor residing in the USA: All three wished to participate anonymously

  • Theoretical perspectives: The study of Persian carpet trade may add to theoretical debates in at least three fields: forms of globalization; concept of ethnic business and the shaping of business relations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The persistence of the Tehran-Hamburg axis, in spite of political and market turbulence, as well as ethnic segregation as the dominant organization characteristic of the Hamburg Free Harbor, stand out as milestones in the presented case. Historical evidence and statistical data is presented that supports these points. The theoretical framework, established below, is partly a point of reference and partly the arena in which this study’s contribution to theoretical articulation and more comprehensive conceptualization take place. The analysis of the case, based on quantitative and qualitative research methods, including desk studies and historical review (described below) will be set in perspective with the existing knowledge about the dynamics and mechanisms of ethnic economy and ethnic enclave economy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call