Abstract

Despite many therapeutic advances, heart failure (HF) remains challenging to treat and continues to be associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. There is an ongoing need to identify co-morbidities that either contribute to the progression of heart failure or limit the therapeutic response to treatment. One area under active investigation is the treatment of central sleep apnoea (CSA). CSA has consistently been shown to be associated with a worse prognosis in HF patients. Thus, understanding how to diagnose and treat CSA is of paramount importance to the HF clinician. Without treatment, HF patients continue to be at risk for the devastating consequences of CSA. Prognosis is very poor with studies consistently demonstrating poor outcomes among HF patients with CSA. Over the course of the night, each discrete event contributes to increased nor- epinephrine levels and hypoxia which are associated with progressive heart failure and arrhythmias. Initial therapeutic options utilized therapies which were developed for obstructive sleep apnoea with limited success or even harm. ASV is now contraindicated in HF patients with an EF < 45% leaving only 2 potential treatment options: CPAP and transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation. Data from the recently presented (post ESC guidelines) trial on transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation demonstrated efficacy without the need for patient compliance or any safety concerns. It is expected that additional studies in CSA will continue to demonstrate the full impact of treating this important co-morbidity on patients with HF.

Highlights

  • Despite many therapeutic advances, heart failure (HF) remains challenging to treat and continues to be associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality

  • One area under active investigation is the treatment of central sleep apnoea (CSA)

  • CSA has consistently been shown to be associated with a worse prognosis in HF patients.[1,2,3,4,5,6]

Read more

Summary

Background

Heart failure (HF) remains challenging to treat and continues to be associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. There are currently three primary types of these therapies: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), bi-­level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in which pressure levels decrease during exhalation, and BiPAP-a­ daptive servoventilation (ASV) in which the two pressures change due to sensors in the device.[37] The use of CPAP to treat CSA was studied in a large randomized, controlled trial, the Canadian Positive Airway Pressure Study (CANPAP) This trial was stopped early due to slow enrollment and safety concerns as the treatment group initially had a higher mortality than the treatment group.[38] over time, no difference in morbidity or mortality was seen.

Javaheri S
15. Ward M
18. Stokes W
Findings
21. Dempsey JA
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call