Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2014, the Grand Canal of China was inscribed on the World Heritage List. The aim of this article is to elucidate its nomination process. The findings reveal that the process was complex, as the seemingly powerful state authorities had to negotiate with numerous human and non-human factors beyond their control. By using the actor-network approach, it is posited that the final information on the Grand Canal included in the nomination dossier is a result of compromises among a variety of agencies, including both human actors (such as the state authorities, the nomination team, representatives of other state ministries, and those from local bureaus) as well as non-human factors (such as national hydraulic project, unexpected excavation and damage of archaeological findings, and existing built environments, among others). There is a web of relations co-produced by forces and interests of different agencies. The relationship between the meaning-making of heritage and the state power is more complex than implied by the criticisms put forth in extant critical analysis of World Heritage.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.