Abstract

Objective: to investigate the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of patients with low back pain in the presence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) disease.Patients and methods. The investigation design involved three visits: V 1 (inclusion); V 2 (after 7 days), and V 3 (after 3 months); after the screening period, the investigation enrolled 259 patients aged 65.5 [62.5; 69.5] years; of them there were 165 (63.7%) women. At V 1 , according to magnetic resonance imaging findings, the patients were divided into two groups: 1) 157 patients without confirmed SIJ disease; 2) 102 patients with confirmed SIJ disease. During all visits, the investigators made general clinical and neurological examinations and assessed the intensity of pain syndrome according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in millimeters, a neuropathic pain component according to the DN4 questionnaire, by determining the blood parameters: transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, Beta-Crosslaps, the indicator of bone matrix formation procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and by estimating the urinary level of deoxypyridinoline.Results and discussion. At all visits, Group 2 patients with higher VAS pain scores had a pain history that was statistically significantly longer (p<0.001). The ANOVA analysis showed that the patients in Group 2 had statistically significantly higher values of TGF-β1, IL-1β, IL-6, and bone resorption markers than those in Group 1, which suggests the relationship between pain syndrome and the presence of an inflammatoryresorptive process in patients with SIJ disease.Conclusion. A high (39.4%) prevalence of SIJ disease was noted in patients over 60 years of age with low back pain. During the follow-up period, there was a decrease in bone resorption markers and cytokines; however, the SIJ disease group showed less pronounced changes with statistically significant differences in all parameters than in the non-SIJ disease group. It is advisable to consider an algorithm for diagnosing a patient over 60 years of age with low back pain, by mandatorily examining his/her SIJ. Treatment policy, including methods for correction with drugs, should be discussed based on the findings.

Highlights

  • The main clinical and diagnostic characteristics of patients with low back pain and sacroiliac joint diseases Zolotovskaya I.A., Davydkin I.L

  • At V1, according to magnetic resonance imaging findings, the patients were divided into two groups: 1) 157 patients without confirmed SIJ disease; 2) 102 patients with confirmed SIJ disease

  • The investigators made general clinical and neurological examinations and assessed the intensity of pain syndrome according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain in millimeters, a neuropathic pain component according to the DN4 questionnaire, by determining the blood parameters: transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, Beta-Crosslaps, the indicator of bone matrix formation procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and by estimating the urinary level of deoxypyridinoline

Read more

Summary

ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ И МЕТОДИКИ

Основные клинико-диагностические характеристики пациентов с болью в нижней части спины и патологией крестцово-подвздошных суставов (результаты исследования ИОЛАНТА-II). Цель исследования – изучение клинико-диагностических характеристик пациентов с болью в нижней части спины (БНЧС) и наличием патологии крестцово-подвздошных суставов (КПС). По данным анализа ANOVA, у пациентов 2-й группы отмечены статистически значимо более высокие показатели ТФРβ1, ИЛ1β, ИЛ6 и маркеров костной резорбции в сравнении с пациентами 1-й группы, что предполагает взаимосвязь болевого синдрома с наличием воспалительно-резорбтивного процесса у пациентов с патологией КПС. Objective: to investigate the clinical and diagnostic characteristics of patients with low back pain in the presence of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) disease. A high (39.4%) prevalence of SIJ disease was noted in patients over 60 years of age with low back pain. (БНЧС) среди взрослого населения крайне высока [1, 2]. щаяся первопричиной болевого синдрома [5]

Не ослабевает интерес к проблеме специалистов разного
Болевой анамнез был статистически значимо
На первом этапе исследования
Findings
Период наблюдения
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call