Abstract
Research background: The European Union currently provides financial support to the Member States through various financial tools from European Structural and Investment Funds 2014?2020, and previously from the EU Structural Funds. In both terminologies, the funds represent the main instrument of EU Cohesion Policy to sustain territorial development, to increase competitiveness and to eliminate regional disparities. The overall impact of EU Funds depends on the structure of funding and absorption capacity of the country.
 Purpose of the article: The efficiency of funding across the EU Member States is a fundamental issue for EU development as a whole. The Author considers deter-mining the efficiency of EU Funds as an issue of high importance, and therefore this paper provides a contribution to the debate on the role of EU Cohesion Policy in the Member States. The paper focuses on territorial effects of relevant EU Funds in programming period 2007?2013 in infrastructure through efficiency analysis.
 Methods: Efficiency analysis is based on data at the country level, originating from ex-post evaluation of Cohesion Policy programmes 2007?2013 and representing the input and output variables to analyse whether the goal of fostering growth in the target countries have been achieved with the funds provided, and whether or not more resources generated stronger growth effects in transport accessibility. The paper deals with comparative cross-country analysis, descriptive analysis of dataset and multiple-criteria approach of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) in the form of output-oriented BCC VRS model of efficiency and output-oriented APM VRS subsequently model of super-efficiency.
 Findings & Value added: The paper aims to test the factors of two inputs and five outputs, trying to elucidate the differences obtained by the Member States in effective use of the European Regional Development Fund and the Cohesion Fund in the transport sector. The paper determines if the countries have been more efficient in increasing their levels of competitive advantages linked with transport. Preliminary results reveal that most countries with a lower amount of funding achieve higher efficiency, especially countries in a group of so-called ?old EU Member States?, i.e. group EU15.
Highlights
The establishment of the EU market at the beginning of new area; the European Union (EU) Member States currently enjoy many benefits in this respect: a free market, effective trading, enhanced security, economic cohesion, sustainable development, protection of human rights, creation of jobs etc
The efficiency of the EU funds is an issue of high importance, and this paper provides a contribution to debate on the role of the EU Cohesion Policy in the EU Member States
The study was focused in terms of its objectives on measurement and evaluation of the main achievements of programmes and projects implemented under the scope of the EU Cohesion policy and finding out facts and information about their effectiveness and utility of achievements over the long-term period, i.e. from 1989 to 2012 in 15 chosen regions of the selected EU15 Member States
Summary
The establishment of the EU market at the beginning of new area; the European Union (EU) Member States currently enjoy many benefits in this respect: a free market, effective trading, enhanced security, economic cohesion, sustainable development, protection of human rights, creation of jobs etc. How efficiently the Member States apply the European funds is a basic and pivotal topic for success and continuity of implementation of the EU Cohesion Policy, and especially so in the context of the economic crisis and the growing number of regions with low levels of development that the incorporation of so-called new countries into the EU has assumed. Such circumstances have forced the EU to make huge economic efforts to maintain and increase the resources for the funds, and so it is vital for the European authorities to know how effective the funds are being applied (Enguix et al, 2012). The efficiency of the EU funds is an issue of high importance, and this paper provides a contribution to debate on the role of the EU Cohesion Policy in the EU Member States
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
