Abstract

A series of publications of the results of National Toxicology Program (NTP) studies (Tennant et al. (1987) Science, 236, 933–941; Haseman et al. (1990) J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 85, 964–971; Shelby et al. (1993) Environ. Mol. Mutagen., 21, 160–179) show that the commonly used short-term genotoxicity tests are less predictive of rodent carcinogenicity than once thought. These results have fueled a great deal of debate in the field of genetic toxicology regarding appropriate strategies for assessing the potential carcinogenicity of chemicals. The debate has continued in the recent discussion of harmonized genotoxicity test strategies (Ashby (1993) Mutation Res., 298, 291–295 and Ashby (1994) 308, 113–114; Madle (1993) Mutation Res., 300, 73–76 and Madle (1994) 308, 111–112; Zeiger (1994) Mutation Res., 304, 309–314) since the underlying problem still has not been resolved. The underlying problem is the fact that the current short-term genotoxicity tests in any combination do not provide both the necessary high sensitivity and high specificity needed for accurate rodent carcinogen detection. In this discussion, we describe the utility of the newly revised Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay alone and in combination with the Salmonella mutation assay for improved accuracy of screening of rodent carcinogens relative to standard short-term genotoxicity tests. The accompanying papers provide details of improved methodologies for the conduct of the SHE cell transformation assay and an extensive review of the databases which support our conclusion that the SHE cell transformation assay provides an improved prediction of rodent bioassay results relative to other in vitro genotoxicity test batteries.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call