The Low–Flow-Mediated Arterial Constriction in the Upper Limbs of Healthy Human Subjects are Artery Specific and Handedness Independent

Abstract

Low–flow-mediated constriction (LFMC) has been used to assess resting endothelial function in peripheral conduit arteries. The literature describes discrepancies in the behaviour of radial versus brachial artery in response to low-flow state, the reasons for which were not addressed in a systematic and scientific way. Moreover, the influence of handedness on observed LFMC responses has not been investigated. The present study aimed at systematic measurement and comparison of the LFMC responses in radial and brachial arteries of both dominant and non-dominant arms of healthy human volunteers. We also investigated the physiological factors associated with differential LFMC response of radial versus brachial artery in the same group of subjects. Longitudinal B mode ultrasonographic cine loops of radial and brachial arteries were acquired at baseline and after producing distal circulatory arrest. Cine loops were screen grabbed and analyzed later using automated edge detection algorithms to measure end-diastolic diameters. Distal circulatory arrest was produced over the proximal forearm (for the brachial artery) and over the wrist (for the radial artery) at 250 mm Hg for 5 min after baseline measurements. Results suggested that arterial location (p = 0.0001) and baseline diameter (p < 0.0021) emerged as independent predictors of LFMC response. Differences in the LFMC responses are handedness independent and could be attributed to the arterial location along with the differences in their baseline diameters.