Abstract

The relationship between baseline cognitive impairment (CI) and incident visual impairment (VI) in Asians is unclear. To determine the associations between baseline CI with incident VI and visual acuity (VA) at 6-year follow-up in multiethnic Asians. Cohort. Population-based. Two thousand three hundred and twenty-four adults aged ≥60years from the Singapore Epidemiology of Eye Diseases Study (response rate 64%). CI was defined using the validated Abbreviated Mental Test (AMT). VA was objectively measured using a LogMAR chart. Any incident VI was defined as having no VI (Snellen's VA better than or equal to 20/40) at baseline but present (VA worse than 20/40) at 6-year follow-up. VI severity was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision. Associations were assessed using logistic and linear regression models. Of the 2,324 participants, 248 had CI at baseline. Presence of baseline CI was associated with more than twice the odds of any incident VI, incident mild and moderate-severe VI (OR [95% confidence interval]: 2.48 [1.55-3.90], 2.07 [1.17-3.55], and 2.61 [1.36-4.93], respectively) and worse VA (β [95% confidence interval]: 0.026 [0.006-0.046]) at 6-year follow-up. The leading causes of incident VI were cataract and under-corrected refractive error. Older adults with CI had more than double the odds of VI development and poorer VA than their cognitively intact counterparts, and most causes of incident VI were correctable. Strategies such as targeted vision screening and early intervention for early detection and management of vision loss in patients with cognitive decline are warranted.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.