The Logic of Territory Choice: Implications for Conservation and Source-Sink Dynamics

Abstract

Previous article No AccessNotes and CommentsThe Logic of Territory Choice: Implications for Conservation and Source‐Sink DynamicsHanna Kokko, William J. Sutherland, Rufus A. Johnstone, and Associate Editor: Andrew SihHanna Kokko*Corresponding author; e‐mail: [email protected]. Search for more articles by this author , William J. Sutherland Search for more articles by this author , Rufus A. Johnstone Search for more articles by this author , and Associate Editor: Andrew Sih Search for more articles by this author 1. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, United Kingdom;2. Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, United Kingdom;3. School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United KingdomPDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 157, Number 4April 2001 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/319317 Views: 60Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref HistoryReceived January 29, 2000Accepted November 30, 2000 Keywordshabitat selectionsource‐sink dynamicsevolutionarily stable strategybreeding site competitionterritorialityfloating© 2001 by The University of Chicago. PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nathan W. Byer, Brendan N. Reid The emergence of imperfect philopatry and fidelity in spatially and temporally heterogeneous environments, Ecological Modelling 468 (Jun 2022): 109968.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109968Subir Ranjan Kundu Shifting of environmental factors related to ecophysiological and adaptive responses of spiders, (Jan 2022): 179–197.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90041-6.00009-7Erik G. Noonburg, Rindy C. Anderson Asymmetric competition and floater dynamics, Ecology 102, no.22 (Dec 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3238Bernt-Erik Sæther, Steinar Engen Towards a predictive conservation biology: the devil is in the behaviour, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374, no.17811781 (Jul 2019): 20190013.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0013Martijn van de Pol, Yngvild Vindenes, Bernt-Erik Sæther, Steinar Engen, Bruno J. Ens, Kees Oosterbeek, Joost M. Tinbergen Effects of climate change and variability on population dynamics in a long-lived shorebird, Ecology 91, no.44 (Apr 2010): 1192–1204.https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0410.1Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Jorge Canales-Lazcano, Jesús Guillermo Jiménez-Cortés, Nahum Juárez-Valdez, Humberto Lanz-Mendoza, Alex Córdoba-Aguilar Spatial and temporal population differences in male density and condition in the American rubyspot, Hetaerina americana (Insecta: Calopterygidae), Ecological Research 24, no.11 (Mar 2008): 21–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-008-0476-2 Martijn van de Pol , Ido Pen , Dik Heg , and Franz J. Weissing Variation in Habitat Choice and Delayed Reproduction: Adaptive Queuing Strategies or Individual Quality Differences? M. van de Pol et al., The American Naturalist 170, no.44 (Jul 2015): 530–541.https://doi.org/10.1086/521237J.P. Heath, G.J. Robertson, W.A. Montevecchi Population structure of breeding Harlequin Ducks and the influence of predation risk, Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, no.66 (Jun 2006): 855–864.https://doi.org/10.1139/z06-059 Andrés López‐Sepulcre and Hanna Kokko Territorial Defense, Territory Size, and Population Regulation. A. López‐Sepulcre and H. Kokko, The American Naturalist 166, no.33 (Jul 2015): 317–325.https://doi.org/10.1086/432560 Jean‐François Le Galliard , Régis Ferrière , and Ulf Dieckmann Adaptive Evolution of Social Traits: Origin, Trajectories, and Correlations of Altruism and Mobility. J.‐F. Le Galliard et al., The American Naturalist 165, no.22 (Jul 2015): 206–224.https://doi.org/10.1086/427090Niclas Jonzén, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Hugh P. Possingham TREND DETECTION IN SOURCE–SINK SYSTEMS: WHEN SHOULD SINK HABITATS BE MONITORED?, Ecological Applications 15, no.11 (Feb 2005): 326–334.https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5168Judy A. Stamps, V. V. Krishnan, Mary L. Reid SEARCH COSTS AND HABITAT SELECTION BY DISPERSERS, Ecology 86, no.22 (Feb 2005): 510–518.https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0516 References, (Jan 2004): 599–682.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012323448-3/50026-XJason V Watters, Sean C Lema, Gabrielle A Nevitt Phenotype management: a new approach to habitat restoration, Biological Conservation 112, no.33 (Aug 2003): 435–445.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00343-9R. M. Sibly, J. Hone, T. H. Clutton–Brock, William J. Sutherland, Ken Norris Behavioural models of population growth rates: implications for conservation and prediction, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 357, no.14251425 (Sep 2002): 1273–1284.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1127