Abstract
The scientific status of the law of effect and applied research that involves the law of effect are examined through a falsificationist analysis of the logic of research and the demarcation question, that is, what should be regarded as scientific. Some logical and epis-temological problems of a nonfalsificationist, inductivist conceptualization of science are reviewed. A falsificationist demarcation criterion is discussed as an alternative that is free of such logical and philosophical difficulties. A brief review of the history of the law of effect and criticisms of the law of effect is presented. It is concluded that the law of effect is in principle falsifiable and, hence, it is scientific. However, questions are raised regarding the extent to which the law of effect actually has been tested, given the Duhem-Quine thesis and problems with independent and valid means of identifying reinforcers. Minimally, practical questions are raised regarding what the law of effect is and how it is to be tested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
