Abstract

This is a beamer presentation of MIMS eprint 2013.38 of the same title (joint authors are A-M. Aubert, P. Baum, R. Plymen, M. Solleveld). Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field. We establish the local Langlands correspondence for all inner forms of the group $SL_n (F)$. It takes the form of a bijection between, on the one hand, conjugacy classes of Langlands parameters for $SL_n (F)$ enhanced with an irreducible representation of an S-group and, on the other hand, the union of the spaces of irreducible admissible representations of all inner forms of $SL_n (F)$. An analogous result is shown in the archimedean case. To settle the case where $F$ has positive characteristic, we employ the method of close fields. We prove that this method is compatible with the local Langlands correspondence for inner forms of $GL_n (F)$, when the fields are close enough compared to the depth of the representations.

Highlights

  • Let F be a non-archimedean local field

  • The Langlands correspondence (LLC) for inner forms of SLn(F ) is derived from the above, in the sense that every L-packet for G consists of the irreducible constituents of ResGG ( φ(G))

  • Via the Langlands correspondence, the additional ones are associated with irreducible representations of non-split inner forms of GLn(F )

Read more

Summary

The LLC for G should be an injective map

The image should consist of all such pairs, which satisfy an additional relevance condition on ρ This form of the LLC was proven for “GLn-generic” representations of G in [29], under the assumption that the underlying local field has characteristic zero. The hope is that one can turn (2) into a bijection by defining a suitable equivalence relation on the set of inner forms and taking the corresponding union of the sets Irr(H) on the left-hand side Such a statement was proven for unipotent representations of simple p-adic groups in [41]. Langlands parameters for GLn(F ) (respectively, SLn(F )) take values in the dual group, and they must be considered up to conjugation. It is worth noting that our group C(φ ) coincides with the group Sφ+ defined by Kaletha in [32] with Z taken to be equal to the centre of SLn(F )

More often one encounters the component group
Then φ is relevant for
We also note that
The construction of the intertwining operators
It follows immediately from the definition of ζr that
For γ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.