Abstract

BackgroundPatients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and synchronous liver metastases (sRLM) can be treated according to the liver-first approach. This study aimed to evaluate prognostic factors for completing treatment and in how many patients extensive lower pelvic surgery might have been omitted. MethodsRetrospective analysis of all patients with LARC and sRLM treated at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute according to the liver-first between 2003 and 2016. ResultsIn total 129 consecutive patients were included. In 90 patients (70%) the liver-first was completed. Ten patients had a (near) complete response (ypT0-1N0) of their primary tumour. In 36 out of 39 patients not completing the liver-first protocol palliative rectum resection was withheld. Optimal cut-offs for CEA level (53.15 μg/L), size (3.85 cm) and number (4) of RLMs were identified. A preoperative CEA level above 53.15 μg/L was an independent predictor for non-completion of the liver-first protocol (p = 0.005). ConclusionTen patients had a (near) complete response of their primary tumour and, in retrospect, rectum sparing therapies could have been considered. Together with 36 patient in whom palliative rectum resection was not necessary this entails that nearly 40% patients with LARC and sRLM might be spared major pelvic surgery if the liver-first approach is applied. A predictor (CEA) was found for non-completion of the liver-first protocol. The majority of patients underwent resection of both primary tumour and hepatic metastasis with curative intent. These findings together entail that the liver-first approach may be considered in patients with LARC and sRLM.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call