Abstract

University of ManchesterThe Persian Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān (‘the Story of Sanjān’), written in 1599 CE, is our only source for the account of the supposed Zoroastrian ‘migration’ from Iran to India in the 8th cent. The last of the Sasanian kings, Yazdegard III, had been deposed after the battle of Nehāvand in 642 CE, and Zoroastrian Iran was overrun by Arab invaders who Islamicized Iran after hundreds of years of Zoroastrian domination of the country under Achaemenian, Parthian and Sasanian empires (530 BCE–651 CE). According to the Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān, ‘Iran’ was ‘shattered’ by the Arab conquest, and those who remained faithful to the old religion fled from persecution by the new Muslim presence. The Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān tells of the long journey of a group of Zoroastrians to seek asylum in India, and the subsequent resettlement there, where they later became the Parsis, ‘the Persians’. The key factor in this re-placement of Iran is their finding a new monarch, not in human form but in a sacred fire, called ‘King of Iran’. When it is read as a myth of charter and series of rites de passage, it reveals much about the literary construction of place as a form of religious and social commentary.

Highlights

  • The Persian Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān (‘the Story of Sanjān’), written in 1599 CE, is our only source for the account of the supposed Zoroastrian ‘migration’ from Iran to India in the 8th cent

  • Iran was invaded and plundered by Alexander of Macedon in antiquity, and it was overrun by Arabs bringing Islam in the 7th century CE, yet it has never been a Western colony in modern times like much of the Middle East and South Asia

  • Today in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Zoroastrianism is practised by only a small minority community: the Iranian prophet Zoroaster is not considered by Islam as belonging to the line of divine revelation, and Zoroastrians are not considered ahl al-kitāb, ‘people of the book’ who are in receipt of divine revelation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Persian Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān (‘the Story of Sanjān’), written in 1599 CE, is our only source for the account of the supposed Zoroastrian ‘migration’ from Iran to India in the 8th cent. This Sultan Mahmud may be identified as Sultan Mahmud Shah I, known as Begadha ‘two forts’, of Gujarat (ruled 1459–1511).3 It is likely that these battles never took place as described in the Qeṣṣe-ye Sanjān and that they serve as an opportunity for the author of the text to engage in lurid accounts of war in which the Zoroastrian warriors save the day for the Hindu prince, and exact a sweet, cold revenge, for justice’s sake, on Islam, many centuries after they had been defeated in the Iranian homeland by the Arab invaders.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call