Abstract

Recent investigations of how the median size of extragalactic radio sources change with redshift have produced inconsistent results. In a previous investigation Eales compared the radio and optical properties of a bright 3C and a faint 6C sample and concluded that for a universe with Ω0 = 0Dmed ∝ (1 + z)-1.1±0.5, with Dmed being the median size of the radio sources at a given epoch and z the redshift. Oort, Katgert, & Windhorst, on the other hand, from a comparison of the properties of a number of radio samples, found a much stronger evolution, with Dmed ∝ (1 + z)-3.3±0.5 forΩ0 = 0. In this paper we attempt to resolve the difference. We have repeated the analysis of Eales using the much improved data, in particular, the virtually complete redshift information that now exists for the 6C sample. Confining our analysis to FR 2 sources, or classical doubles, which we argue is the best understood class of radio sources and the least likely to be affected by selection effects, we find Dmed ∝ (1 + z)-1.2±0.5 for = ω0 and Dmed ∝ (1 + z)1.7±0.4 for Ω0 = 1. Moreover, in contrast to earlier studies, we find no intrinsic correlation between size and radio luminosity. We show that there is a selection effect that affects studies of this kind, the magnitude of which has not previously been realized and has likely led to an overestimate in the strength of the size evolution found in previous investigations. Our complete redshift information allows us to gain insight into our result by plotting a radio luminosity- size (P-D) diagram for the 6C sample, the first time this has been possible for a faint radio sample. The most obvious difference between the 3C and 6C P-D diagrams (i.e., the radio astronomers' H-R diagram) is the clump of sources in the 6C diagram at D ˜ 100 kpc, P151 1027-1028 W Hz-1 sr-1. These clump sources have similar sizes to the emission-line regions found around high-redshift radio galaxies, suggesting that the presence of dense line-emitting gas around high-redshift radio galaxies is responsible for the size evolution. We show that this explanation can quantitatively explain the observed size evolution, as long as either there is little X-ray emitting gas around these objects or, if there is, it is distributed in a way similar to the distribution of the emission-line gas, namely, highly anisotropic and inhomogeneous.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.