Abstract

Congress has proposed raising the legal limits on contributions to defined contribution plans in the private pension system to increase the amount people can save for retirement. Using a model of hypothetical lifetime savings, this paper analyzes the current proposals in a sample of defined contribution plans which permit individuals to choose how much to save every year. The analysis demonstrates first that the current limits comfortably accommodate reasonable, plausible savings rates. The proposals only benefit individuals who can save at extremely high rates. Second, the proposals do not increase the average or marginal tax subsidies for savings available through the private pension system and may well decrease them for individuals at the lowest income levels. Third, the proposals will, however, increase the absolute amount of dollars received in tax subsidies but the distribution pattern of those dollars across income groups will remain the same. The paper concludes that these proposals fail to deliver the fundamental reform needed by the private pension system. It suggests that any reform efforts should focus more on incentives and subsidies for those who are left out and left behind in the current system rather than for those who don't need them to save.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.