Abstract

ABSTRACTThe paper explores the concept of World Bank capacity development. It argues that capacity development is under-defined, enabling the World Bank to live up to often contradictory demands toward domestic development and retaining legitimacy as a ‘knowledge bank’. On the ground, vagueness translates into technocratic approaches to institutional reform, based on a simple definition of learning. The case of central public administration reform in Moldova demonstrates how institutional changes under the label of capacity development translated into little change in administrative behavior. It shows how a country can maintain a sense of modernization through capacity development despite little actual change.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.