Abstract

Every set of rules comes with a jurisdiction, or domain of activity to which it applies. Good jurisdictional boundaries cannot be decided on through abstract models or philosophical speculation, but must be discovered empirically. Good boundaries vary according to background social and technological conditions as well as the sort of interaction that the jurisdiction is meant to govern. Since these conditions are liable to change through time, successful boundary drawing will depend upon a method for discovering better boundaries and correcting errors. Classical liberals have traditionally emphasizes either ex ante consent or ex post exit as methods for determining what counts as a good boundary. I argue that ex post exit has been relatively neglected and has potential to address some of the shortcomings of ex ante consent as a standard for evaluating boundaries. Written for the Mont Pelerin Society Essay Contest.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call