Abstract

Over the past 300 years of plant collecting for herbaria, the basic method of preservation has remained remarkably consistent - a plant press with absorbent paper. However, the difficulty of drying plant specimens in the humid tropics has led to a variety of additions to this basic technique, primarily to prevent the specimens succumbing to fungal and bacterial breakdown. These additions include drying gently in tents over low fires, soaking the specimens in alcohol before pressing and, more recently, drying the specimens with forced heat from hair dryers. The process of drying is, however, known to cause breakage and damage to the plant's DNA, as well as providing time for non-plant organisms (bacteria and fungi) to multiply in the tissue, potentially 'swamping' the plant specimen’s own DNA. Contemporary plant collectors therefore usually collect a separate sample for DNA work, usually rapidly dried in silica gel desiccant; historical collections, however, may have been treated with alcohol and/or heat. We have recently shown that Hyb-Seq provides a reliable method for retrieving robust sequence data from even very old and degraded herbarium specimens. In this study we have used a panel of specimens preserved using a variety of methods to assess whether Hyb-Seq is capable of retrieving informative amounts of sequence data from duplicate specimens preserved using a range of specimen preservation methods. We present data on the amount and quality of DNA and of sequence data retrieved, the variation in error types between preservation techniques and the utility of the data for phylogenetic analysis.

Highlights

  • Over the c. 3 centuries that plant collections have been deposited in herbaria, a wide variety of plant preservation techniques have been used (Smith, 1971; Bridson and Forman, 1999; Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (RBGE), 2017), including air-drying, heat, and soaking specimens in alcohol prior to drying

  • We have shown that Hyb-Seq allows recovery of hundreds of kilobases of nuclear genomic sequence from herbarium specimens collected in tropical rainforests over 170 years ago (Hart et al, 2016), we do not have records of the preservation methods that were used by the nineteenth century collectors of the specimens sequenced

  • In order to see how widely applicable Hyb-Seq will be as a method for recovering genetic information from herbarium specimens, in this paper we examine the effect of different preservation methods on DNA quantity and quality and sequence analysis, including library quality, library capture success, sequencing, read assembly and consensus calling, for a range of common plant collection methodologies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the c. 3 centuries that plant collections have been deposited in herbaria, a wide variety of plant preservation techniques have been used (Smith, 1971; Bridson and Forman, 1999; RBGE, 2017), including air-drying, heat, and soaking specimens in alcohol prior to drying (the Schweinfurt method; Schrenk, 1888). 3 centuries that plant collections have been deposited in herbaria, a wide variety of plant preservation techniques have been used (Smith, 1971; Bridson and Forman, 1999; RBGE, 2017), including air-drying, heat, and soaking specimens in alcohol prior to drying (the Schweinfurt method; Schrenk, 1888). Hyb-Seq in Damaged Herbarium Specimens effect of different collecting methodologies on the preservation of genetic material varies widely. In order to see how widely applicable Hyb-Seq will be as a method for recovering genetic information from herbarium specimens, in this paper we examine the effect of different preservation methods on DNA quantity and quality and sequence analysis, including library quality, library capture success, sequencing, read assembly and consensus calling, for a range of common plant collection methodologies

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call