Abstract
The article deals with the evaluation of evidence procedure in the modern Russian criminal trial in a somewhat unusual context. On the one hand, marking the historical continuity of the law, the author draws attention to the rather wide margin of evalu- ation of evidence, he speaks of the «limitless» possibilities of law enforcer in this matter: he can apply diskrtsiyu in volume, which is necessary in a particular case. On the other hand, the analysis of certain provisions of the Code, and above all his art. 75, testifies to the existence of such restrictions. Among these include: the need to respect the principle of legality, establishing the objective truth of the case, ensuring the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, and, finally, the psychological and subjective factors that make official a slave of your emotions, expressions of individual personality traits. The author of care from the dangers caused by this ambiguous situation, it is proposed to formulate the law of criminal procedure the principle of justice with emphasis on human rights function a judge, prosecutor, investigator and the investigator.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
