The Limit of the Appellate Court’s Sentencing Discretion under Article 368 of the Criminal Procedure Act; When the Defendant Who Had Been Rendered an Indeterminate Sentence from the First Instance Court Lost the Status as a Juvenile During the Appellate Proceeding, and the Appellate Court Should Reverse the Sentencing to a Determinate Sentence Which is not More Severe than the

Eun-Kyung Cho

doi:10.22825/juris.2021.1.55.026

The Limit of the Appellate Court’s Sentencing Discretion under Article 368 of the Criminal Procedure Act; When the Defendant Who Had Been Rendered an Indeterminate Sentence from the First Instance Court Lost the Status as a Juvenile During the Appellate Proceeding, and the Appellate Court Should Reverse the Sentencing to a Determinate Sentence Which is not More Severe than the

Eun-Kyung Cho

https://doi.org/10.22825/juris.2021.1.55.026

Copy DOI

Publication Date: Mar 16, 2021

#Indeterminate #Appellate Court + Show 5 more

Abstract
Full-Text PDF
Similar Papers

Abstract

The Limit of the Appellate Court’s Sentencing Discretion under Article 368 of the Criminal Procedure Act; When the Defendant Who Had Been Rendered an Indeterminate Sentence from the First Instance Court Lost the Status as a Juvenile During the Appellate Proceeding, and the Appellate Court Should Reverse the Sentencing to a Determinate Sentence Which is not More Severe than the

Full Text