Abstract

We provide for the first time a complete parametrization for the matrix elements of the generic asymmetric, non-local and gauge-invariant canonical energy-momentum tensor, generalizing therefore former works on the symmetric, local and gauge-invariant kinetic energy-momentum tensor also known as the Belinfante-Rosenfeld energy-momentum tensor. We discuss in detail the various constraints imposed by non-locality, linear and angular momentum conservation. We also derive the relations with two-parton generalized and transverse-momentum dependent distributions, clarifying what can be learned from the latter. In particular, we show explicitly that two-parton transverse-momentum dependent distributions cannot provide any model-independent information about the parton orbital angular momentum. On the way, we recover the Burkardt sum rule and obtain similar new sum rules for higher-twist distributions.

Highlights

  • On the other hand, spin is an intrinsic property of a particle defined as one of the two Casimir invariants of the Poincare group

  • We provide for the first time a complete parametrization for the matrix elements of the generic asymmetric, non-local and gauge-invariant canonical energymomentum tensor, generalizing former works on the symmetric, local and gaugeinvariant kinetic energy-momentum tensor known as the Belinfante-Rosenfeld energymomentum tensor

  • Ji has shown that the kinetic OAM, which is local and gauge invariant, can be expressed in terms of Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs) that are accessible in some exclusive experiments like e.g. Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering [9]

Read more

Summary

The gauge-invariant linear and angular momentum tensors

In order to deal most conveniently with the various gauge-invariant decompositions proposed in the literature, we consider the following five gauge-invariant energy-momentum tensors. Where n is a timelike or lightlike four-vector and d3r = αβγδ nα drβ ∧ drγ ∧ drδ is the volume element This ensures that the quark and gluon linear and angular momenta are the same in the three kinetic decompositions d3r TBneνl,a(r) = d3r JBneνlρ,a(r) =. For a given phase factor, the difference between the gauge-invariant kinetic and canonical decompositions lies in the separation of total linear and orbital angular momentum into quark and gluon contributions. Which are called potential linear and angular momentum tensors [41, 42], respectively

Parametrization
Constraints
Local operators
Light-front constraints
Four-momentum conservation
Forward limit and momentum
Angular momentum
Link with measurable parton distributions
Generalized Parton Distributions
Transverse-Momentum dependent Distributions
Conclusions
A Parametrization
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call